Spatial Variation in Morphometric Traits of Carabus Granulatus L., 1758 (Coleoptera: Carabidae) at A Small Scale

Authors

  • ROMAN GORBUNOW Institute of Ecology and Subsoil Use, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan
  • VIKtor ALEXANOV State Budgetary Institution of Kaluga Region “Parks Directorate”, Russian Federation
  • SERGEY LUZYANIN Kemerovo State University, Russian federation
  • SERGEY BERDNIK Institute of Ecology and Subsoil Use, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation
  • RAISA SUKHODOLSKAYA Institute of Ecology and Subsoil Use, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57038/usjas.v9i1.7449

Keywords:

carabid beetles, discriminant analysis, morphometry, habitat type

Abstract

This study examines the small-scale spatial variability of morphometric traits in the carabid beetle Carabus granulatus L., 1758 across diverse habitats in Kaluga Province, Russia. A total of 5,039 specimens were collected from seven distinct vegetation types to assess the impact of environmental conditions and anthropogenic pressure on morphological variation. Linear discrimination analysis revealed statistically significant, though subtle, differences in morphology among habitats, most notably in pronotum length and elytral dimensions. Beetles from urban and suburban areas tended to be larger and more robust, whereas individuals from natural floodplain habitats were generally smaller. These findings enhance our understanding of ecological influences on intraspecific morphological diversity and support the use of morphometric traits as indicators in environmental biomonitoring.

References

1. Newman, M.C. (1995) Quantitative Methods in Aquatic Ecotoxicology. New-York: Lewis Publishers Ltd.
2. Staton, J. L., Schizas, N. V., Chandler, G. T., Coull, B. C., & Quattro, J. M. (2001). Ecotoxicology and population genetics: the emergence of ‘phylogeographic and evolutionary ecotoxicology’. Ecotoxicology, 10, 217-222.
3. Hauser, L., Hemingway, K. L., Wedderburn, J., & Lawrence, A. J. (2003). Molecular/cellular processes and the population genetics of a species. Effects of Pollution on Fish: Molecular Effects and Population Responses, 256-288.
4. Peiman, K. S., & Robinson, B. W. (2017). Comparative analyses of phenotypic trait covariation within and among populations. The American Naturalist, 190(4), 451-468. DOI:10.1086/693482
5. Lavorel, S., & Garnier, E. (2002). Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional ecology, 16(5), 545-556.
6. Stearns, S. C. (1998). The evolution of life histories. Oxford university press.
7. Sukhodolaskaya, R. A., Saveliev, A. A. & Shamaev, D. E. (2017). ??????? ???????? ????? ?? ???????????? ???????? ???????? Poecilus cupreus L. (Coleoptera, Carabidae) [The influence of environmental factors on the size variability of the beetle Poecilus cupreus L. (Coleoptera, Carabidae).]. Principles of the Ecology, (3 (24)), 118-131. DOI: 10.15393/ j1.art.2017.5382
8. Belosludcev, A. D., Alexanov, V. V., Sukhodolskaya R. A. (2023). ??????? ?????????? ??? ?????? ??????????? ????? ? ??????? (?? ??????? ?????-???????) [Green areas as a factor in the conservation of biota in cities (using ground beetles as an example)]. ????????????? ???????? ???????????? ???????: ??????? ??????? ?????? ?? ?????????? 10-? ????????????? ??????-???????????? ???????????, 1-13.
9. Martinson, H. M., & Raupp, M. J. (2013). A meta?analysis of the effects of urbanization on ground beetle communities. Ecosphere, 4(5), 1-24.
10. Sk?odowski, J. W. (2019). Do catch rate and body length of two dung beetles species depend on the severity of the stand disturbance? Sylwan, 163 (5), 425?434

Downloads

Published

2025-07-24