Scope of the journal

This Journal will publish the articles generally on following topics to be received from authors of food departments agencies, medical undergraduates, post graduates, research scholars, General practitioners, health care service providers and medical teaching staff.:

 Nutritional analysis

 Food technology

 Health care

 Diabetes, cardiovascular disorders, kidney disorders, liver diseases eutectic.

 Biochemistry of food and diseases.

 Dietary factors associated with different diseases.

 Biochemical analysis  Nutritional therapies for different diseases.

 Nutritional quality and implications of processed food.

 Bio availability of nutrients and non-nutrients in conventional or Non-conventional sources,

 Nutritional quality of common foods.

 Food acceptability and dietary selection.

 Food adulteration and contamination and its link to human health.

 In-silico research

 

Review Policy and Process

 The Sindh University Journal of Biochemistry, Nutrition and Food Science will publish high quality and original research work. All manuscript submissions will be subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable, it will be processed further for peer review by independent/ anonymous expert referees.

 All submitted manuscripts will be read by the editorial boar and staff. To save time and effort, only those papers that meet editorial criteria will be sent for formal review. Papers judged by the editors to be of insufficient general interest or otherwise inappropriate will be rejected promptly without external review.

 Manuscripts judged to be of potential interest to our readership will be sent for formal review to two reviewers. The editors will then make a decision, based on the reviewers’ advice, from among several possibilities:

 Invite the authors to revise their manuscript to address specific concerns before a final decision is reached.

 Reject, but indicate to the authors that further work might justify a re-submission.

 Reject outright, typically on grounds of specialist interest, lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual advance or major technical and/or interpretative problems.